Bretton Woods Project - Critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Jump to main content | Jump to sidebar | Jump to navigation menu



Bank trade evaluation: assume the position

News|Bretton Woods Project|24 May 2004|update 40|url
print|email |bookmark FacebookTweet thisdel.icio.usDigg!Stumble UponRedditGoogle BookmarksYahoo Buzz

The World Bank Operations Evaluation Department's plan for an evaluation of Bank assistance on trade shies away from many of the key issues according to ChristianAid.

The evaluation framework is premised on the assumption that trade liberalisation leads to growth which will in turn, in the long run, lead to poverty reduction. The link between trade liberalisation, growth and poverty reduction, says Claire Melamed, is "assumed to be sufficiently strong that poverty measures are rarely mentioned as an indicator of the success or failure of Bank trade assistance." Instead it is assumed that indicators such as export performance and trade balance are sufficient.

The evaluation sets itself five specific questions:

  • What was the impact of Bank assistance on specific outcomes such as import liberalisation?
  • Was the Bank's advised speed and sequencing of reforms appropriate?
  • Did the Bank advice take key external factors into account?
  • Was the Bank's support accompanied by appropriate policy and institutional reforms?
  • Did the Bank's assistance on trade focus on poverty and distributional outcomes?

Missed is the opportunity to address more fundamental questions about the political economy of trade policy choices. Was the choice of trade liberalisation itself appropriate - did the Bank allow sufficient space for the consideration of alternative trade policy options? And has Bank influence weakened the domestic capacity for trade policy analysis or diminished the role of other international agencies?

After over a year spent off-track, a scoping workshop was finally held last December in Tanzania, leading to the release of an approach paper in mid-March. A series of regional consultations are now underway. The evaluation itself will involve a literature review, a review of the Bank's portfolio of trade programmes, the creation of thematic background papers and country case studies in Brazil, Indonesia, India, Kyrgyz Republic, Mozambique, Senegal and Zambia. The final product is to be presented to the board in mid 2005.

Published: 24 May 2004 , last edited: 19 October 2009

Viewings since posted: 6394

Articles: 3795

Advanced article search
Search newswire and resources

Recent briefings & reports

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 7: April 2013  25 April 2013

Working paper: The private sector and climate change adaptation: International Finance Corporation investments under the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience  24 April 2013

The UK's role in the World Bank and IMF: Department for International Development and HM Treasury  13 March 2013

World Bank on jobs: a "significant departure" or "business as usual"? 13 February 2013

The World Bank and industrial policy: Hands off or hands on? 6 December 2012

Climate Investment Funds Monitor 6: October 2012   26 October 2012

Latest video from IFIwatch.tv

The awakening of the squares 20 May

Subscribe

Bretton Woods Update, 6 emails/year:
highlights fulltext pdf
Alerts of new web content
Weekly newswire email

Email:


Bretton Woods Project on Facebook


home | subscribe | donate | search | help | contact


validate: | XHTML | CSS | RSS | 508

powered by Action Apps | hosted by GreenNet | Credits